|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Faceting limits
|
By Bruce
L. Harding
Holden, Massachusetts, USA
Copyright GIA |
| Table of content |
|
|
| |
| Introduction |
The pavilion and bezel slopes commonly
recommended for faceting are the result of trial-and-error and
human judgment. This explains why references differ in their
recommendations.
Trial-and-error is an effective
way to solve complex problems until a better way comes along,
but it usually finds only the best solution in the range of
experimentation. Other good solutions may exist – beyond the
bad ones – but are found only by accident. This has been as
true in faceting as in many other scientific fields.
Inspired by an exceptionally brilliant
but strangely-cut emerald, the writer went in search of these
other solutions and found that there are indeed two ore three
areas of good design for each gem material.
This article presents the first
and most important result of that search – charts for each of
the common faceting materials which show areas of good and bad
pavilion and bezel slope combinations; it also defines maximum
and minimum table sizes briefly (more later). The faceter can
choose from the various «good» areas according to what he thinks
is best or to suit the limited proportions of his rough material.
The text describes the formation
of these charts so that you can understand them better. Technical
details are omitted; it is assumed that you are either familiar
with gemology optics or don`t care. The mathematics involved
are quite simple but are deferred to an appendix for those who
care to understand them or who may need to create additional
charts. |
| |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
| © Octonus Software & MSU Gemological Center.
|
|